sno4wy – The Missing My Time Harassment Context
Hi, I’m Snowy (alias: sno4wy).
This site exists because I’ve been the target of a long-running harassment and smear campaign in the My Time At / Pathea Games fandom, and I need a stable, public place where my side of the story can exist in my own words.
For a long time, I stayed quiet and hoped the situation would burn out on its own. It didn’t. Instead, my silence was treated as guilt, and a false narrative about me was allowed to spread without meaningful pushback.
I am a private individual, an artist, and a longtime fandom participant. I am not interested in mobbing anyone, relitigating gossip, or turning this site into a harassment hub in reverse. My goal here is much simpler:
- to provide a clear summary of what happened,
- to document patterns of harassment and institutional failure,
- and to make sure that when people search my name/handle, the only thing they find is not a smear narrative written by people who hate me.
What this site is
This is a public clarification and documentation hub.
What this site is not
This is not a callout blog, a revenge project, or an invitation to harass anyone on my behalf.
If you have a good-faith question, you are welcome to contact me. If you are here to provoke, dig for gossip, or continue the harassment, I will not engage.
Quick Context / FAQ
Is this just fandom drama?
No. This site documents a long-running harassment and smear campaign connected to the Pathea / My Time fandom and community. The situation has involved reputation damage, private warnings, cross-platform monitoring, context-stripped material, and attempts to remove me from online spaces.
What is the 700-page document?
The 700-page document is a callout/smear document about me that I dispute as misleading, context-stripped, and reliant on subjective interpretation, amateur psychological speculation, and selective presentation of evidence. The document was created and circulated by people primarily associated with the group calling themselves “Simprock fucks”, a social circle with a history of targeting members of the My Time fandom they dislike. The campaign escalated after I defended a friend who had also been targeted by people in that circle. Based on the timing, pattern of behavior, and the receipts I possess regarding their conduct, I believe one purpose of the campaign has been to discredit me in advance, in case evidence of their own behavior ever comes to light.
Was the February 2025 document really a spontaneous response?
The roughly 700-page document was publicly released in February 2025 in a way that appeared to frame it as a response to someone defending me publicly. However, I have evidence suggesting that the document, or at least a substantial organized version of it, existed months earlier, around November 2024 or before.
This matters because it changes the context. If the document was already being compiled privately before the public incident used to justify its release, then the February 2025 release was not simply an immediate response to being criticized or asked to be left alone. It suggests a longer pattern of monitoring, organizing, and preparing material to discredit me.
I do not claim that every detail is definitively proven. However, several events appear to cluster around the same period: I was told about the existence of a document, there was a wave of unfollowing by people connected to Simprock, the Simprock group itself fractured and became more openly clique-like, and other public/private actions began that appeared to frame me as dangerous or harmful before I had any meaningful way to respond.
A fuller timeline and evidence summary will be added on a separate page.
Why mention Pathea?
Pathea matters because official and official-adjacent community spaces, moderation decisions, bans, and moderator appointments have affected how the harassment narrative spread and how difficult it has been for me or my supporters to respond.
Over time, Pathea has repeatedly applied its rules unevenly. Attempts by me or my supporters to explain my side, correct misinformation, or object to the harassment narrative have resulted in removals, warnings, bans, or other restrictions. Meanwhile, people connected to the harassment narrative have been allowed to target, allude to, or spread reputation-damaging claims about me in official or official-adjacent spaces, often without comparable action. Some have remained present or have been given additional legitimacy through moderation roles or official-adjacent positions.
This is why I do not view Pathea as a neutral background party in this situation. Their moderation choices have not merely failed to stop the harassment; they have helped create a public record where my responses are erased or restricted while hostile framings of me remain visible.
Why does the deletion of my Discord history matter?
After barring me from its official Discord, Pathea deleted thousands of my messages from the server. This matters because it removed a large public record of how I actually spoke, interacted, and participated in the community over time. As a result, one of the few remaining “records” of my behavior is the selectively preserved and context-stripped material circulated by people involved in the harassment campaign.
I believe this worsened the imbalance: my ordinary participation was erased from the official space, while hostile or skewed archives of me remained available elsewhere. Whether or not that was Pathea’s intent, the effect was to make it harder for people to compare the harassment narrative against a fuller record of my actual conduct.
Why is this site unfinished?
The documentation is extensive and emotionally difficult to organize. I am publishing this site while it is still in progress because public search results, AI summaries, and secondhand narratives have already caused ongoing harm, and I need there to be a clear central record of my perspective.
————————————–
Contact / Evidence — how to reach me with specific concerns
What Happened — a short overview of the harassment campaign
Pathea’s Role — how the company responded, and failed to respond
Timeline — a concise record of major developments
————————————–
Work in Progress Notice: This site is still being built. I am publishing it before it is complete because public search results, summaries, and secondhand narratives about me have already caused ongoing harm. This site is intended to provide a clear central record of my perspective, with additional timeline entries, documentation, screenshots, and context to be added over time.
————————————–
Interim Public Notes: This site is still being built. While I continue organizing the fuller timeline, evidence, and dossier entries, I have also posted shorter public notes about specific aspects of the situation.
These posts are not the full documentation. Some are written in a more immediate, conversational format because they were made while the situation was actively unfolding. I am including them here as interim context and public record while the more formal pages are completed.
These links are included for transparency and continuity while this site remains under construction. The final documentation will be organized more formally, with clearer timeline entries, supporting context, and evidence where available.
Tumblr Statement: Ongoing My Time Harassment Campaign and Cross-Platform Escalation: This Tumblr post is an earlier public statement documenting that the My Time harassment campaign was still ongoing more than two years later. It describes the failure of the “ignore them and they’ll get bored” approach, the expansion of the roughly 500-page callout document into approximately 700 pages, and the pattern of blaming unrelated fandom conflicts on me. The post also documents whisper campaigns, attempts to get me removed from other servers and communities, throwaway accounts used to bypass boundaries, cross-platform tracking, attacks on old AO3/Tumblr content, and accusations that anyone who supports me must secretly be an alternate account. It also discusses the weaponization of mental-health language, including suicide/veteran resources, Reddit Care Resources, and unqualified psychological speculation used to frame me as unstable or dangerous. I am including it here as an interim public record showing that the harassment pattern, cross-platform escalation, and reputation-damage concerns were already being documented before the newer Reddit posts and before this site was completed.
Transparency Post: Anonymous Accounts Claiming to Speak for Artists: This Reddit post documents a specific harassment-related pattern in which empty or low-history Reddit accounts appeared solely to leave aggressive messages claiming to speak on behalf of artists whose work had been reposted with credit and direct links. The post explains that when I spoke directly with the actual artists, their responses were kind, reasonable, and not aligned with the hostility of the anonymous accounts. It also connects this incident to the broader harassment campaign, including throwaway accounts, impersonation attempts, stalking behavior, daily self-harm encouragement, and the roughly 700-page smear document. I am including it here as interim context because it shows why I require direct communication from the actual person involved, rather than accepting anonymous “representatives” at face value. It also documents that I publicly stated I would honor artists’ wishes regarding how their work is shared.
Targeted Bullying Tied to the Pathea Games / My Time Fandom: This Reddit post documents the ongoing harassment campaign as an online bullying pattern tied to the Pathea / My Time fandom. It describes the use of alt and throwaway accounts, mass reports, whisper campaigns, cross-platform monitoring, and attempts to get me removed from unrelated online spaces. It also summarizes concerns about the roughly 700-page callout document, including context-stripped screenshots, amateur psychological speculation, and social summaries being treated as fact by people who have not read the full document. The post also discusses the use of mental-health language and resources as a way to give the harassment a veneer of concern or legitimacy, while continuing to frame me as unstable or dangerous. It is included here as an interim public record of the harassment pattern while the fuller timeline and evidence pages are still being organized.
AI Search Summary Flattening Harassment Into “Community Dispute” Language: This Reddit post discusses the harm caused when AI-generated search summaries describe a multi-year harassment and smear campaign as a “community dispute” or “debate” over criticism versus harassment. It explains how hostile public remnants, deleted posts, rumors, and context-stripped “documentation” can continue shaping search results even after original posts are removed. The post also describes the emotional impact of seeing the harassment narrative become part of a searchable public identity, especially when the target does not currently have the time or energy to finish a full public response. It is included here as an interim record of how search engines and AI summaries can preserve and neutralize harmful framing rather than clearly identifying it as targeted harassment.
Emotional Impact of Long-Term Online Harassment: This Reddit post describes a real-world breaking point caused by the long-running harassment campaign: after feeling overwhelmed, I went on a late-night drive without a clear destination, was pulled over for driving slowly/suspiciously, and broke down crying while explaining the harassment to a police officer. The post documents the exhaustion of trying standard anti-harassment advice — blocking, ignoring, avoiding, seeking resources — while the campaign continued across platforms. It also explains the harm caused by people framing me as unstable or “needing help” while using fake concern, Reddit Care Resources, and mental-health language as part of the harassment. I included that I was not suicidal or interested in self-harm, but overwhelmed and feeling powerless. This is included as interim context showing the offline emotional and practical impact of sustained online bullying and reputation damage.
Practical Advice Request: What to Do When Disengaging Does Not Stop Harassment: This Reddit post asks for practical advice after more than two years of online harassment, including daily anonymous abuse, a roughly 700-page smear/callout document, dedicated harassment blogs, out-of-context screenshots, mockery, attempts to tie me to fake or alt accounts, and concerns about personal information. It explains that I had largely disengaged from the people involved, but that silence did not stop the campaign; instead, new material appeared to be reframed or manufactured to keep the narrative alive. The post also documents concerns about official or official-adjacent community spaces, including being banned after asking the game company for help, suppression of people who spoke up for my side, and fear that harassment-aligned individuals in official roles could mishandle sensitive information. It is included here as an interim record of the no-win dynamic created by the campaign: responding can be twisted into more “evidence,” while silence allows others to keep controlling the story.
Ethics of Public Psychological Speculation Without Consent: This Reddit post asks when, if ever, it is ethical to publicly analyze someone’s psychology without their consent. It describes how an untrained person wrote a detailed “psychoanalysis” of me based on limited online interactions, then included it in a large public callout document that some people now treat as evidence that I am unstable, dangerous, or manipulative. The post distinguishes ordinary criticism from psychological speculation and asks where the ethical line falls between criticizing behavior, discussing general patterns, implying mental-health explanations, and presenting psychological interpretations as proof that someone is unsafe. It is included here as interim context for the role amateur psychoanalysis and mental-health language have played in the smear campaign.
Legal Advice Request: Multi-Year Online Harassment, Doxxing Concerns, and Evidence Preservation: This Reddit post asks what legal options may exist for a multi-year online harassment campaign involving anonymous self-harm encouragement, a large public smear/callout document, dedicated attack pages, out-of-context screenshots and private messages, false fake-account accusations, attempts to connect unrelated activity to me, encouragement to contact police about me, personal-information concerns, and harassment toward people associated with me. It also documents the company/community moderation aspect: after asking official or official-adjacent spaces for help, I was banned from some of those spaces while people involved in spreading the narrative remained present or gained moderation roles. The post is included here as an interim record of the legal and safety concerns created by the campaign, especially around evidence preservation, possible cyberstalking/harassment/defamation issues, doxxing risk, and the question of what options remain when disengaging, blocking, platform reports, and anti-harassment resources have not stopped the abuse.